TIC-TAC! TIC-TAC!: Paul Halter’s The Gold Watch

This is really a special event! For the first time, Paul Halter is releasing his newest work in English before it is published in French. And while the new book, The Gold Watch, er, clocks in at a typical 178 pages, its scope is nothing short of epic.

Divided into two narratives – yet essentially covering four distinct time periods – the book straddles the genres of mystery, fantasy, horror, and psychological suspense. Plus, it’s the first opportunity for English-only readers to observe the author grappling with modern-day people and universal themes in a manner that I can only imagine as being ineffably French.

54c9323489cf4.imageFor those Halter fans who are starting to get worried, let me assure you that the novel’s centerpiece is an impossible crime mystery set in 1911 and featuring dilettante detective Owen Burns and his pal, Achilles Stock. The two are summoned to Raven Lodge, the country home of Victoria Sanders, who runs a fabric importing company and is hosting a small group of friends and family for a snowy winter weekend. Actually, I should say washosting – because Victoria has been found dead in the snow, beyond the woodland that encircles the mansion, and although Burns is sure she has been murdered, only Victoria’s own footprints can be found leading to the body! (Check for yourself: the book provides a map!)

This is Paul Halter, folks, so the investigation unearths a great deal (dare I say too much?) going on. Aside from the usual stuff of mystery – the ne’er do well brother in need of money, the business associate craving power, and a roundelay of romantic intrigues – there are other elements at work that are more sinister and fantastical, bringing in both metaphysical and supernatural elements.

RipperTourBackground

How, for instance, might this crime relate to the vicious murder of a woman ten years earlier in the London streets? (And why did the woman look with horror at her own home just moments before her death?) What is going on with Victoria’s dyer/manservant, an Indian mystic who grows plants he claims are capable of producing a new color that is both invisible and magical? What happened to the yellow book that disappeared from Victoria’s bedside, which Burns claims is a cursed play-script capable of turning a reader suicidal – or homicidal?!? And, of course, what about that gold watch, the element that seems to extricate past and present together with its dangling chain?

It’s a lot, right? Typical Halter, yes?? The fun will be in how he ties it all together, explains the footprints and solves two murder mysteries, okay?? But people! This isn’t even the half of it!!!!Because what I have described comprises only half of this novel. There is a whole other narrative, set in 1991 France, that at first seems to have nothing to do with the mystery featuring Burns. And in its own completely different way, this storyline is as complex as the other, maybe even more so.

Our modern-day hero is Andre Leveque, a successful playwright who has developed a block due to his growing obsession with the fleeting memory of an image of film he saw on TV when he was a boy. That the image corresponds in odd ways with the murder the readers  are treated to in 1901 is confounding – even more so because we know a little boy witnessed that killing, and yet it’s physically impossible for that kid to have been Andre, who is only in his 40’s.

_f5c11708-7bfb-11e7-a713-31f90463e8eb

Thus, we’re forced to wonder constantly whether this novel is going to cut across genres in some way – various theories of reincarnation are proposed and discussed – or whether Halter will do due diligence to the Mystery Author’s Code of Conduct and find natural explanations for everything.

therapylandscape_1651411c

In order for Andre to reach some answers (and appease his young, pretty wife, who appears to have secrets of her own), Andre consults both – a psychoanalyst . . . .

 

Untitled-design-59-810x486and an astronomer! What happens with each of these consultants deepens the mysteries of Andre’s life in intriguing ways, taking him back to his childhood in the late 1960’s and to a whole new country home where yet another seemingly impossible crime unfolds: the fall of a woman from a quarry when nobody is near her. Surrounding this possible murder is yet more romantic intrigue and always – always! – the image of the gold watch!!

8bdaacd15d6ec22faa87781ad87efc5b

How, you might imagine if you are a true fan of Halter’s work, does the author manage to interweave these two (three? four???) disparate stories, subtly drawing parallels at first, and then creating deeper mysteries over how these events spanning a century are connected? You know me: I’m the first to kvetch about the author’s “kitchen sink” method of cramming as many plot elements in as possible (did The Devil of Dartmoor have two ghosts or three?), but I have to say this is all rather delicious. And Halter adds a new layer by insinuating real life art and legend into the novel’s plot. That cursed yellow book, for instance, may be familiar to fans of horror fiction: Robert W. Chambers’ book of short stories The King in Yellowwas purported to have the same effect on readers/viewers as described herein. Halter even incorporates Chambers’ play plot into his own.

51O7YyTZXvL

The same co-opting occurs in the present, as Andre’s obsession with the film he saw the trailer allows Halter to weave discussion about real films noir into the narrative. One film, in particular, becomes an essential clue on Andre’s journey; if you know your film noir, you can figure out which film it is because, yet again, Halter borrows a set of plot ideas wholesale from someone else. Still, I found a heightened sense of suspense from Halter abandoning, at least half the time, the safe cloak of the past, where readers might be more accepting of the plethora of fantastical events that often comprise a GA mystery. What happens in the modern narrative seems very much a hybrid between “classic” mystery and modern psychological novel, which may or may not be to your taste but which I found interesting.

Whether it’s ultimately a successful tour de force or just . . . too. . . much . . . depends on whether you think Halter succeeds in tying it all together in the end.I know already that we must agree to disagree on this point. Suffice it to say that all narratives conclude in dramatically explosive (and highly varied) ways, that the solution to one murder case is, as often happens, disappointing (I’m not even sure I know exactly what it implied in the end) but that the other murder exemplifies GA impossible crime tropes – which is to say Halter honors classic ideas (this time he even includes Christie!) and makes something original out of them. I have to say, though, that this time the solution is so deeply rooted in what I will call the F/D/BC Gambit (don’t ask unless you want me to spoil things for you) that it unintentionally gave me the giggles. I also think that, in the interest of surprise, Halter doesn’t play particularly fair with the reader on several key points.

No matter: The Gold Watch moves at a rapid pace, is full of major twists, is consistently entertaining, and in many ways seems the most unabashedly French in tone of all his novels I’ve read so far.

 

Advertisements

17 thoughts on “TIC-TAC! TIC-TAC!: Paul Halter’s The Gold Watch

  1. What an innovative-sounding book, Brad. I really respect authors who do that sort of genre-crossing, and yet, can still put together a cohesive story with a focus. And it’s really exciting news for those readers who haven’t yet ‘met’ Halter.

    Like

  2. “the solution to one murder case is, as often happens, disappointing”
    Are you referring to the falling off a cliff ?

    Like

    1. Yes! I don’t want to discuss it here, but the whole thing is dismissed in one line and I’m not really sure I understand the ramifications of it.

      Like

  3. First of all “tic tac, tic tac” – the sound of a ticking clock in French or a mystery involving breath mints?

    Second of all, I might have to dip into some Paul Halter since this book sounds really interesting. As you well know, I am not nearly as versed or knowledgeable in all this GAD literature (like, not at all) as you and your followers and fellow/fella devotees. So I often read your posts and my eyes begin to glaze over a bit as I find that I suffer from a lack of understanding what the heck you’re blogging about. I mean, I go for the more contemporary, “easier” fare. My French mysteries begin and end with Fred Vargas (she’s got a new one out!) and I’m almost done reading the third Ann Cleeves’ Vera novel (so much fun to have Brenda Blethyn’s voice in my head as I read.) So you know, although corpulent, I’m a lightweight. Having said that and having used a few run-on sentences to do so, I was THRILLED to read about your London trip. Well done! Can we get together sometime so I can get the recounting in person? Send me a text or an email, you world traveler, you! And welcome home!

    Like

    1. I think I’m jet lagged! I was reading your post and I thought, “Oh, my friend Viv likes Fred Vargas, too!” Let’s get together so I can explain in person why you probably should not read Paul Halter (pronounced “al TAAAIIIRR”). I really need to buy more spices at the Ferry Building. It doesn’t mean we have to go to the Farmer’s Market, though, so we’re not limited as to days. Let me know.

      Like

  4. I didn’t read this under the best of circumstances (too much work and heat), but I definitely did not like how the two threads were merged together. I guess I expected a much more brilliant way of linking things, given how nicely he has done so in the past.

    That being said, Paul Halter books are always fun, even if the impossibilities in this one were not as strong.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The modern day narrative captured my imagination more than the other because it was a new experience for me with Halter. Ultimately I agree with you that it doesn’t link together as satisfactorily as I would have wished, but with Halter I’m getting more adept at just going along for the ride – and this ride was an ambitious one.

      Like

      1. Yeah but it at the same time it felt very strange.
        I still think there is a nice narrative to be had by combining two different plots where Owen Burns and Dr. Twist investigate crimes which are
        connected somehow (it’s just 20 years difference after all)

        Like

      2. Absolutely! Like do we even find out who the ten-year-old witness turns out to be? The “past” plot could have been fleshed out more, resulting in a more satisfying book. And the 1960’s part was disappointing in practically every aspect.

        Like

  5. I won’t be reading this for a long time (don’t want to run the well dry after all), but I’m salivating at your description of the plot. Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t this the second time you’ve been the first blogger round these parts to post a review of a Paul Halter release by LRI?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes, and what do I get for it?!? In three months or so, JJ will write about it and there will be sixty responses within 24 hours! Pffffttt!

      Like

  6. I fell in love with The Gold Watch but wanted to give it another read in a month or so before writing or commenting about it. Thematically, it’s the most interesting of Halter’s works (that I’ve read so far). The sins of the past, fate, time lost and running out—those are essential crime fiction themes. Narratively, they are presented in interesting ways.

    The almost casual nature of the past plot sometimes made it seem like an impression of a detective novel. There were times I couldn’t tell which story was commenting on the other. The set-up was grand and when the plot runs off the rails, it does so in glorious fashion.

    I like it when artists take chances. I’ve got a feeling I’ll like it, even more, a second time.

    Like

    1. I agree that I liked it more for the risks Halter took. Setting half the novel in modern day gave him permission to break from the traditional GA tropes he usually (sorta) holds fast to. If one can accept that as one reads, I think it will be a more enjoyable experience.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s